This
is the definitive phono stage:

And
here's the line stage, aka "The Plate
Follower":

And
this is the completed high voltage supply. You
can see I've implemented a
hybrid regulator consisting of a LM317 (3 pin voltage reg) and a common
power
mosfet, the IRF840. This last one needs an heatsink, or you could also
use a
metal chassis (insulated!). Instead the LM317
doesn't even need one. Now I've got clean 220V: but the voltage could
be tweaked
by acting on R7.

Here
it is... sorry for the bad photos ;)


Ehm...
the volume knob isn't definitive, real one
is still in the building
process...
Some
details of the internal construction: I've
used both point to point and
PCBs.

Specifications:
-
line gain: 11 (or 21dB)
-
phono gain: 63 (or 36dB)
Parts:
All
the resistor that don't have a power rating
are intended to be 1/2W. Note
that 1/4W also will work, as I tend to be very conservative with power
ratings.
But in general 1/4W resistors aren't rated to those voltages. Use only
high
quality 1% metal film resistors (or ceramic power resistors where
needed).
About
capacitors: for the electrolytics, voltage
ratings are shown in the
schematics, use the best caps you can afford (strongly suggested
105° switching
applications ones, low ESR). For other caps use polypropilene / mylar
or
whatever flavour you like, but please use HIGH voltage ratings, at
least
400-600V. Higher voltage film caps tend to sound better due to better
construction.
Grounding:
Use
star ground system. It really helps in a
sensitive low-level design like
this. You can read about star ground over the internet, just use Google.
Measurements:
The
gain of the preamplifier is about 57dB, of
which
36dB in the phono section and about 21dB in the line. The line section
does measure flat (±0.1dB) from 20Hz to 30kHz, and the phono
section follows the updated IEC RIAA curve within ±0.1dB
(actually less, but there is measurement error to remember) from 50Hz
to 20kHz, and ±0.5dB from 10Hz to 30kHz. This, without
special
components or any selection (neither resistors or capacitors) is a sign
of excellent
performance. The ±0.5dB differences in the extremes of the
audio band are justified because:
- in the high end, some roll off is better, since
it
will avoid noise from the LP surface to enter, and better rejection of
EMI-RFI interference. Actually, most LP doesn't have much output over
15-18kHz. Also consider that a typical MM cartridge has a resonance in
the upper audio band, determined by its inductance and the capacitance
of the load (both the cables, 100-200pF, depending on the type, and the
input capacitance of the first amplification stage, about 100pF) , and
some compensation for this resonance isn't bad.
- in the low end, since I don't have an
over-the-top
turntable, I preferred to loose RIAA accuracy in favour to better
rejection of infrasonic noise. In fact there isn't a roll-off in the
low end, as you might think: the 30-50Hz zone is a bit accentuated, by
about 0.5dB, but the gain is abruptly cut under 10Hz. This is a "mod"
from the original design (I updated the schematics in this page, now
they reflect exactly the circuit I'm using), since before I was
following closely the RIAA curve, and got some infrasonic rumble and a
poorly defined bass. With this additional shaping, I got much less
noise and a cleaner, punchier bass. Of course this may be tuned to suit
your speakers or your ears, you can play with C1 or C4, the latter is
easier to deal with.
THD of the line section cannot be measured with my instruments, we're
under -80dB up to 5-10Vrms output. The phono stage has a SNR ratio of
about 70dB, this could get much better by smarter mechanical
construction of the preamplifier, and maybe by shielding the tubes.Of
course let me know if you mod the circuit, and what do you think about,
I will add mods and suggestions here.
Update
15/02/2007: hit
"refresh" in your browser when you're looking at the phono section's
circuit. I've updated it, notice C8. Use it (a 400V silver mica part)
to implement the fourth time constant in the RIAA curve. That's not
generally needed with high quality vinyls, but some less-than-optimal
ones need it. I think it makes an useful upgrade.
You could make it switchable, also you can use different values (not
exceeding 200pF, or the like) to tune the upper end of the spectrum.
Note that 82pF is the best simulated value to obtain a flat response.
- Home -
Giaime's
email:
(This
isn't an hyperlink. To protect my account from spamming, you have to
manually
enter this address in your mailer. Thank you!)
This
site is
© Copyright Giaime Ugliano 2004-2009, All Rights
Reserved. All the contents of this site, where not explicitely said,
are exclusive intellectual propriety of myself, copy-and-paste
of any of the parts of this site is
absolutely proibhited.